Elysian Shadows

C++.

Cheers for the epic walls of text.

Damn, someone necro-ed this bitch! Well, first my biological father used to force me to code QBasic at around the age of 6. I wrote a few extremely simple programs, but I was not able to grasp very much of programming. My dad used to get pissy and basically make me feel like shit about it, so I comp...

Mine is Gamecube, but since that isn't there I'd pick SNES because of all the sick games on it. Gamecube controllers are my all time fav controllers, I have a GC to USB controller adapter and play games like Silent Hill 2 and Alone in the Dark 4 with it. I find lots of controllers fit awkwardly in ...

Why the fuck... I wonder if there's some OSX-specific flags you can pass to GCC on OSX to make it disable retardism...

Interesting.

Try this at the command-line to display the working directory of your processes:

-D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG=0 -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG_PEDANTIC=0 Although I highly, highly doubt that is your actual problem. I have used GCC from the command-line many times before, and that is what IDE's like QtCreator are doing behind the scenes. Are you positive that your file is actually in your application's w...

We kicked off OVER half the team for sitting around with their thumbs up their assholes spectating while we carried the burden of the project. Please list all of the contributions everyone kicked from the team has made to the project in the last three years. Clearly you have a good point too... Espe...

Return a constant reference, unless, as MarauderIIC said, there is an error case. Then return a constant pointer so that you can return NULL. There is really no point in returning objects like that by value in C/++. You can still keep keep data encapsulated and require modification via a separate se...

LMFAO!!!!

Just reposted this on Facebook after almost pissing my pants.

MarauderIIC wrote:I thought it looked like one, derp. I brainfarted and combined his non-pointer syntax with your stuff about placement new. embarrassing

lol you're fine. For a minute I thought that was legit too.

^ that will not invoke the destructor. Your extra scope there will remove the pointer from the stack, not destroy what it's pointing to. That's a memory leak.

We definitely do have a few REALLY good pixelers/artists around these parts... but they're mostly working on their own projects (or ES), I think.

Just a few things, gentlemen... Let's say you do this: class foo { public: std::string bar; int baz; }; foo f; f is instantiated on the stack and then constructed using the implementation-provided default constructor, I'm just being anal, but if you're actually declaring that at global scope, f is b...

Just beat Final Fantasy IX... I have never dreaded beating a game so much in my life. Over the last few weeks, I have absolutely fallen in love with this game. I seriously didn't want to see it end... I have played every FF (minus 13, but that's because it's fucking terrible), and this is by far my ...