Elysian Shadows

Man, I would literally kill to have a second monitor at work... I didn't have one and my boss did.. i mentioned to him and the next day when I came into work my boss's monitor was sitting on my desk. Haha. We are close to fifty devs and ops guys in a single room, so I think it would be a little dif...

How about this: give me the declaration of a pointer to a function that takes a pointer to a function which accepts an int, const pointer to char and a pointer to a const double and returns an array of pointers to functions that accept a const pointer to const char and returns an array of pointers t...

Man, I would literally kill to have a second monitor at work...

Falco Girgis wrote:While these boards probably seem dead to you guys,

What!? This is the best forum on the internet! It recently got blocked at work (damn you, Trend Micro!) and made me learn how to route traffic through my personal server just to access it.

That is a great example of how linux development can benefit other operating systems. Valve surely was a major driving force on this release, when they started porting steam.

Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo...

They'd have my 600 dollars now if it wasn't for the 50% tax we pay here in Brazil when importing stuff

My cousin showed this game to me this weekend and I thought the same thing: they went through all the trouble to implement multiple engines and they just throw it away on a 4-hour game? He said the game is worth every penny, though.

1. It is if creating a copy of Weapon is costly (e.g. it has a 1000 element array you have to copy). Actually, if I were to answer your question as-is: yes, passing a reference to an object instead of copying it is always more "memory efficient". Most of the times, though, this memory effi...

I'm pretty sure Foo g = f; is still using the copy constructor. The rest of the post is right on, though. P.S.: yeah, just tested it: class C { public: C() {} C(const C & other); C & operator=(const C & other) {} }; int main() { C c; C d = c; } $ g++ --version; g++ -o test test.cpp g++ (...

Sorry to revive a semi-dying thread, but I just found this. Basically it says some applications on windows (like google chrome) lower the (global) timer interrupt interval when they are running, which may cause the behavior you're seeing.

I also appreciated the long-needed delete, override and default keywords for method declarations. It always seemed so wrong not to have them... These are the kind of features that are trivial to implement (most of the functionality is already there in the compiler), but make a huge difference for pe...

It does, doesn't it? It's incredible how such a simple (if you don't consider closures, of course) feature can change the way you look at a language.

Care to share some context?

The best part is "p_fVal1 == 0". Gotta save those FPU cycles.