lol. if it ends up in the page(this means the web browser downloads the file so it can fucking use it) the so called "hacker" still gets the code. You really don't get it. if it ends up on their machine in any way they can see it.
Gyro Sheen wrote:you pour their inventory onto my life
IRC wrote:
<sparda> The routine had a stack overflow, sorry.
<sparda> Apparently the stack was full of shit.
Kcirtap1990 wrote:O Moderator, Moderator, wherefore art thou Moderator?
dont be such a commie. let people say what they want.
I'm all for letting people say what they want. But this thread has gone from a legitimate discussion to trolling and flaming, and I am not all for that.
Kcirtap1990 wrote:O Moderator, Moderator, wherefore art thou Moderator?
dont be such a commie. let people say what they want.
I'm all for letting people say what they want. But this thread has gone from a legitimate discussion to trolling and flaming, and I am not all for that.
so you think everything that you are not "for", should be silenced?
Some person, "I have a black belt in karate"
Dad, "Yea well I have a fan belt in street fighting"
avansc wrote:so you think everything that you are not "for", should be silenced?
I think discouraging trolling and flaming falls under common internet forum etiquette and really shouldn't be viewed as my own personal views.
nah i get what you are saying, i was just really busting your balls. but i do think making it a habbit of just closing threads is a bad thing. i think this community will band together against a blatant trouble seeker like this. and if he persists im sure there will be actions taken like bans or thread closings. but i think its important to let people duke it out first.
Some person, "I have a black belt in karate"
Dad, "Yea well I have a fan belt in street fighting"