Page 2 of 2

Posted: Mon Apr 04, 2005 8:38 pm
by JS Lemming
Dj Yoshi wrote:I love how Weebo drives home my point...and you kind of ignore that fact.

:roll:
I'm siding with Arce on this one. He's learning, not writing death-optimization for Bill Gates.

Posted: Mon Apr 04, 2005 10:37 pm
by DJ Yoshi
Well isnt part of learning also learning how to write code more efficiently posted via PSP

Posted: Tue Apr 05, 2005 7:25 am
by JS Lemming
Dj Yoshi wrote:Well isnt part of learning also learning how to write code more efficiently posted via PSP
Yes, but optimization shouldn't be a concern to someone who is still learning the actuall language and syntax.

EDIT: ..... did you say psp? CURSE YOU!

Posted: Tue Apr 05, 2005 12:36 pm
by DJ Yoshi
I think that you should learn efficiency hand in hand with functionality.

And yes, I posted that via PSP.

;)

Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2005 5:28 pm
by Guest
That program was as "efficient" as it was designed to be. It was made to display the STEPS in recursion. I'd like to see you make a program more "efficient" that DISPLAYS the STEPS in the reoccurring functions.

If I wanted it to efficiently tell the answer, I would have done what I did in my third post. I don't think you have any room to talk about efficiency when you haven't even posted a program.

Anyway, how do you figure that your first post, calling my code "bloated and unreadable," has anything to do with efficiency? I think you’re just stalling and cannot admit that you’re wrong.

Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2005 5:31 pm
by Falco Girgis
Grow the hell up. I'm sick of the programming discussion being filled with childish bullcrap. THIS IS FOR PROGRAMING!