Page 1 of 1

Has Science finally discovered the soul?

Posted: Tue Jan 17, 2006 5:27 pm
by skywalker541
http://www.quantumbiocommunication.com/ ... -soul.html


An article i found to be extremely interesting and dumbfounding at the same time. What do you guys think?

Posted: Tue Jan 17, 2006 5:56 pm
by Wutai
That's durn waird. I'm gonna go kill myself now.

Posted: Tue Jan 17, 2006 8:16 pm
by JS Lemming
I didn't read it all. I stopped after this:
What is a space-time event? It is a frozen moment of intention
That means nothing. Nothing at all.

Posted: Tue Jan 17, 2006 8:32 pm
by skywalker541
It makes sense if you read the paragraph after that statement.

Posted: Tue Jan 17, 2006 8:32 pm
by Wutai
It's so confusing and elaborate that it tricks you into thinking that it's true.

Or maybe it is true!

Or not...

I don't know.

Posted: Tue Jan 17, 2006 8:36 pm
by JS Lemming
I'm sorry, but I hate it when people use big words in meaningless sentences to persuade.

Posted: Tue Jan 17, 2006 11:08 pm
by Falco Girgis
I want my 5 minutes back. That was absolutely nothing that we didn't already know.

That's just abstract philosophy. There's no omfg here r teh soul!!!111one.

True, I believe the soul itself is abstract, but still--that article was nothing we didn't already know.

Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2006 7:19 am
by skywalker541
I guess you missed the parts where he backs it up with quantum physics. Or your already an expert in that field.

Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2006 9:32 am
by JS Lemming
He didn't prove anything. He stated his theory.

Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2006 9:52 am
by skywalker541
It may not be proof, but when you get that deep into science almost nothing is absolute.

Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2006 9:09 am
by DJ Yoshi
Yeah...that's just BS disguised as intelligence. I'm no expert in quantum physics, but I know some, and definitely more than you, and even I could tell that was just...stupid.

Posted: Fri Jan 20, 2006 6:27 am
by spideyspiderman2000
BS. That's also really old news.

Posted: Fri Jan 20, 2006 7:25 am
by skywalker541
It's not old that article is dated January 11, 2006.