Elysian Shadows

Why wont my html image hyperlinks show up in internet explorer? It sucks because I dont know what im doing wrong the hyperlinks show up in firefox just not in internet explorer.

look at the code. http://mars.umhb.edu/~mth/

make sure you look at the site in firefox and internet explorer.

IE sucks that's why...

LeonBlade wrote:IE sucks that's why...

I agree. Try Google Chrome.

Firefox FTW

Because you typoed it. should be

LOL missing an ending angle bracket... not good

LeonBlade wrote:LOL missing an ending angle bracket... not good

You spam a lot lol. And its called a Bracket, not angle bracket haha.

LeonBlade wrote:LOL missing an ending angle bracket... not good

He posts random stuff all the time cause he wants a blue egg
I think we should reset his posts!

"Dethklok has summoned a troll"
"That's impossible, there's no such thing as trolls"
"Then how do you explain all the dead unicons?"

That is spam... lol

Also... if it's not angle bracket... then what is [

P.S. I have no desire for such eggs...

LeonBlade wrote:"Dethklok has summoned a troll"
"That's impossible, there's no such thing as trolls"
"Then how do you explain all the dead unicons?"

That is spam... lol

Also... if it's not angle bracket... then what is [

P.S. I have no desire for such eggs...

I saw that episode, that part made me crack uplololol

You just want teh purple egg!

The term I use for the <> symbols is "chevrons," although guillemets is probably more standard.

For others:

() - Parenthesis
[] - Brackets
{} - Braces

As a matter of fact, "angle bracket" is nearly accurate, when referring to a chevron. According to wikipeida, "[Guillemets are] also called angle quotes..." Obviously, context plays a role as well. In mathematics and related disciplines, those symbols denote vectors and inequalities.

They are angles technically...
I've never heard those other terms tbh...

LeonBlade wrote:They are angles technically...

Indeed. I've heard others' refer to them as angle brackets as well. In my mind, it's a perfectly valid phrase because it gets the idea across. I suppose that a linguist might argue against it, but languages are too fluid to stick to dictionary definitions one-hundred percent of the time. I don't often sit around and think, but I was actually pondering this topic earlier today. Most people learn language by reading a book or listening to someone speak. If they were to pick up a word from their professor, which was used incorrectly, then I can't fault them for their mistake. In fact, they aren't necessarily wrong, but I tend to point out the standard usage as tactfully as possible.

Guys.. they're just greater-than and less-than symbols.. geeze.