Page 1 of 2

the sparda defect

Posted: Wed May 06, 2009 10:40 pm
by avansc
sparda wrote: Hahahahahahahahah! Avan avan avan, shame on you :lol:

Does anyone else think that avansc = wearymemory?

I wouldn't be surprised :mrgreen: The only two dick-faces that take everything the wrong way. Everyone else saw that it was not malicious at all, but for some reason these unintelligible and unsociable people did. Out of all the ones that I categorized (unmaliciously) (AND INCLUDING MYSELF), only these two . . . jesus fucking christ. I wrote it once, and I'll write it again:

Antagonizer: (Like Avansc, and the doophus who wrote "No you can't")
First off sparda, i could give two shits what category you put me in, i just dont value you opinion or intelligence enough to have it bug me.
secondly, if you call someone a antagonized or a gayanizer or what ever you cant claim its not malicious, you are not that stupid, so that makes me believe
that either you just lie to yourself and us, or you believe we are just stupid enough to believe your bullshit.

i merely posted the question that i wander what persona they have for a person that categorized people based on their own opinions... and then you went all balistic

yeah maybe im an antagonizer, but so was martin luther king. now im not comparing myself to the good Dr,, but dont for one second assume an antagonizer is something subeserviant/worse to whatever you wanna label yourself as. and the only reason you dont like me is that i am not the type to stay quite when you talk shit. which is when ever you open your mouth. you hate the fact that i as some others dont just listen to what you say without recourse.

"unintelligible " you wanna call me stupid for lack of a better word. well okay. no use in arguing, i challenge you to any intellectual challenge you please. anything. and we can let those results speak for them selves.

ps : if you were referring to not being able to understand me... well then i think we already solved the above challenge.
pps: i really think you owe wearymemory an apology, its far worse to think someone is me than to call them any other childish names.

and finally, i know there are alot of people that dont like me, and you could find them telling you on the forums yeah that dude is an ass. but at least there is not a single person here that can say they dont know where i stand. can you say the same for you?

Re: the sparda defect

Posted: Wed May 06, 2009 10:56 pm
by M_D_K
What about Project Euler for the challenge.

Re: the sparda defect

Posted: Wed May 06, 2009 11:25 pm
by MadPumpkin
avansc, personally i like you, that may sound gay/homosexual/faggish or whatever else, but a lot of your posts make me laugh lol.
it just so happens that i LOVE to laugh, which is why i like Dane Cook, im certainly not comparing you to the god himself, but you do make me laugh haha

Re: the sparda defect

Posted: Wed May 06, 2009 11:54 pm
by avansc
dane cook is a shit comedian.
the only thing i like about him is that he proves that i really am smarter that 99.9 percent of people.

Re: the sparda defect

Posted: Thu May 07, 2009 1:55 am
by sparda
sigh . . .

It seems avan dwells and feeds on forum drama. avan, there was a reason why Marauder locked the previous thread, and now you're trying to start it all up AGAIN here? You're definitely right that everyone knows where you stand, you stand on utter diarrhea.

For one, let me write it out clearly. Avan is a LIAR, yes you read right. A LIAR. He once wrote to me in IRC that he held "no grudges" towards me, as he doesn't "do" that kind of stuff. For those of you who don't know, avan and I had some altercations in the past, that until recently (I thought) we had gotten over. I thought we where cool. But a single non-malicious "categorization" (if you could even call it that), in which I even INCLUDED MYSELF prompted our dear avan to go berserk.

But if there is anything this useless thread that he started proves, is that he in fact holds grudges, and thus is a reprehensible liar. I mean, surely one little post in the last thread did not provoke this kind of response? Only a person who has social issues, and holds anger within until it explodes (grudge), does this kind of thing :mrgreen:

But, yes, YES. I will feed your drama. Because it's fun ;)
AvanSOURCUNT wrote:i just dont value you opinion or intelligence enough to have it bug me.
Wow, what a way to show me up heh? What I do bugs you so little, that it caused this huge massive rant of yours. Can you be any more of a hypocrite? Most definitely.
AvanSICKCHILD wrote:i challenge you to any intellectual challenge you please. anything. and we can let those results speak for them selves.
Why is it that you want to prove yourself against me so badly? Do you hold me in such high regard? :lol:
Okay, I will answer your request. I challenge you to conform to proper English grammar and fucking punctuate your goddamn sentences while you reside withing these forums. Surely it is an intellectual challenge; in fact, I would say it is the ULTIMATE for you. And don't give me "English is not my first language" bullshit; as I submit to you, English is DEFINITELY not my first language as well.

AvanSUCKSCOCK wrote:pps: i really think you owe wearymemory an apology, its far worse to think someone is me than to call them any other childish names.
I wholeheartedly disagree. I owe wearysociability no such thing. For one, if weary is not avan or the converse, then at the very least, he entails what I call the avan-complex. Which is one hideous thing to live with. So I will say, no thank you to that. But I will suggest one thing for you avan. Your mother owes you an apology for giving birth to you. 8-)

Stop making forum post about me! Or else, people will know that you secretly love me. :mrgreen:

Re: the sparda defect

Posted: Thu May 07, 2009 5:08 am
by M_D_K
The thing is sparda he isn't holding a grudge, he's clarifying. And you attack his spelling shows you have nothing else to fault him on all that fluff about grudges is exactly that fluff.
Now we were cool, we used to talk and have a laugh.
But you kept becoming more of a dick. Before you left IRC you tried to bitch me about about the Deimos logo design thread acting like it was the peek of my skills. You post misinformation and think you are the authority on everything. The whole wearymemory thing exists because of your ego can't handle being wrong.

Now here is something interesting, I haven't had official permission to post this but it was said publicly in the IRC channel. So fuck it its going in.

EDIT: I didn't give permission, and I would rather not be a part of the flame war. --Gyro.
EDIT:okay, my bad --M_D_K

Also I think you turned down avansc's challenge because you know you can't do it. You talk like you know what you're talking about but you can't back it up. A diamond studded piece of shit is still shit. And our opinion of you won't change until you can prove yourself(which if the past teaches anything it's that you can't). You talk about projects you're doing but beyond talk we see nothing.

One last thing, name calling doesn't make you right. It makes you a dick!

Re: the sparda defect

Posted: Thu May 07, 2009 10:05 am
by avansc
Okay, I’ll do this with proper English and keep it civil.

Sparda, I did not lie to you. I said that I don’t hold grudges, and I don’t, but that does not preclude me from having a problem with someone. Not liking someone does not mean you hold a grudge against them. Surely you should be able to see the difference.

Take Moose for example, (Hey sweetheart I hope you don’t mind) I have had heated debates with her, and yes have said some things I probably should not have, but I hold no grudge against her about anything, she is an awesome person. I would sit down and chug a case of Mountain Dew with her, twice.

Now you say that you thought we were cool until you made a single non-malicious post. Well that is true and false. Yes we were cool, but that was not a non-malicious post. Most of those categories are meant to be negative, and you know it.

“Definitely has made me much more conscience about the way I present myself in forums, and the like.”

Why would you change your behavior if it were not “negative”?

“Wow, what a way to show me up heh? What I do bugs you so little, that it caused this huge massive rant of yours. Can you be any more of a hypocrite? Most definitely”

I think you misunderstood, let me explain. Placing me in some category does not bug me whatsoever. Because I don’t believe your opinions and thought process warrants me to be concerned about it. However, that does not mean that I will keep quite when you call me a “dick face” and imply that I’m stupid. I’d also like to add that I would have put this in the other thread, but I only read your posts after the thread had been locked, so I did not have the chance to reply there.

The only reason I even mentioned the challenge was because you inferred that I was not intelligent. So rather then arguing about it, I posted that we could partake in any challenge you pleased. Now seeing as how my English in this post seems to be immaculate, I see no reason for you not to take me up on that offer, seeing as how I met yours. But alas I know you wont, because cowards fear failure.

Re: the sparda defect

Posted: Thu May 07, 2009 12:21 pm
by sparda
Look, I think there are few misunderstanding here, and I'd like to clear them up.

First of all, I did not start the name calling. I was rather ambiguous if you remember. The FIRST person to call anyone names, was avan when he called me a dip-shit. If you don't believe me go back and check the "Forum Personas Thread." So now that do you know that, who really is the dick, M_D_K?

Second, to M_D_K. Look, honestly, I don't have anything against you. I actually don't loathe you, as you probably think. All along, our talks have been rather rival-like, and such, and nothing beyond that. The only reason I might come off as "dick," as you put it M_D_K, is probably because I keep fucking arguing with you two guys (avan, M_D_K); either on IRC, or the forums. I've never said I'm an expert on anything; in fact, that kind of ego-trip was the INITITIAL reason avan and I started fighting, because he came off as arrogant, and not willing to admit when he did not know something. I on the other had, have admitted several things: for example, I know shit about web-side stuff, and haven't messed with sandboxing scripting languages, just to name a few. When was the last time you heard anything like that from Mr. Avan?

The only reoccurring event between you and I is that you want me to "prove myself" for some reason. Look, as you know programming is time consuming. So give me a fucking break here. Additionally, I never said I'd like to reveal any of my stuff, and I haven't even mentioned what I'm working on. You'd be right, if I was constantly talking about my projects, and shoving them in your face 24/7, and then not proving any of the things I would "show off," but the truth is that I don't show off anything, so why are you so intent in knowing what I'm doing?

I understand that you might be angry that I "left" IRC, but it was not permanent. In fact, I was planning (until recently) to go back in and patch things up after I was done with school in about 2 weeks. I left that day, because things were getting heated, yes. I deferred returning because, truthfully, IRC was getting in the middle of my school work and I was fucking up, and that altercation seem like a good reason to take a temporary leave.

Now to avan: Listen mister avan, first off all, I never suggested (implicitly or otherwise) that you are unintelligent. Quite frankly I'm surprised that you took the word "unintelligible" by the way it looks and/or sounds. Unintelligible means: Unclear, poorly articulated or enunciated.

The example you gave with Moose was ridiculous. Moose is one of the most sociable and friendly people you can meet on the internet; which is why I ported her MusuGo :) She is even more Awesomer because she didn't get angry at the ugly things you've said (as YOU put it). And Alas, that is where you and I would clash if I were Moose.

And last, about this absolutely useless and stupid challenge of yours. I have two issues with it: first off all, how can we really have a challenge, when we have Google? This challenge is absolutely pointless, unless we are in the same room moderating each other, so no one is compelled to "search". Secondly, our challenges would be completely fucking subjective, AS YOU KNOW IT. Meaning that you'd propose something that you know very well, and I'd propose something that I know really well. I propose this challenge, for example:

Given these datum about players in a basketball game: (given standard deviation = 4, and pts = mean)
2 Forwards -> (12 + pts)/ 4 = 80%
2 Guards -> (11 + pts)/4 = 70%
1 Center -> (20 + pts)/4 = 50%

Calculate the point distributions of each player and graph the normal, binomial, and poisson distributions. Finally, develop the optimal algorithm to calculate the total point distribution of the entire game, for these players, and then graph the bell curve.

Now, I haven't done this particular problem, but I've done a similar one, and I can tell you that it should not take more than two pages of C code; even less if you use MATLAB.

See how stupid this is? It is very biased. The only solution is a third party, and then we have to deal with the possibility of one of us not knowing what they propose. But if you still want to do this, then fine. Propose something then.

To Gyro: Don't worry about M_D_Ks quote. I've been subscribed to you for almost 2 years, so I don't intend on unsubscribing now. Quite frankly, I would like for you to not hate me, but hey, I guess its understandable; I did ask you as stupid question once in IRC about girls.

Re: the sparda defect

Posted: Thu May 07, 2009 2:04 pm
by avansc
okay... now lets just hang on here for a seccond.... you didnt start with the name calling?
sparda wrote: The Moderator: (Like Marauder)
The Antagonizer: (Like avansc)
Smarty Pants: (Like M_D_K for sure ;), myself, Avan, Falcy, Mar, and probably a bunch of others here at the forums as well) )
Johnny One-Word: (Like some guy who bitched about Java to me once: i.e. "No you can't")

AntiGayNizer: (Like Trask ) :lol:
you dont call that name calling?, and when i originally said the thing about the dipshit i was referring to the person who wrote the article.
now let me ask you this?? what was your intention and your expected reaction to calling someont an antagonizer... a "Smarty Pants"... a johnny one-word... and something as
insulting as antigaynizer.

you had an intention calling people that. and you did that name calling first. so dont give me your fucking rhetoric.
sparda wrote:But I will suggest one thing for you avan. Your mother owes you an apology for giving birth to you. 8-)
see.. you just say things that are malicious, and thats fine, but dont act like you dont. and what the fuck is that emoticon for... like trying to say. "got you good fucker"?
you are a sad litte fuck.
avansc wrote:"unintelligible " you wanna call me stupid for lack of a better word. well okay. no use in arguing, i challenge you to any intellectual challenge you please. anything. and we can let those results speak for them selves.

ps : if you were referring to not being able to understand me... well then i think we already solved the above challenge.
please read before you make a douche out of yourself. yeah i agree sometimes my sentences are hard to understand, but anyone with an iq of 100 can still discern what i say.

i propose projecteuler.net, i have done the first 50 or so in 2 days. i will wait to you get to 50, then we can see who finishes all of them first?

im not sure how my example of Moose is ridicules, i used it to illustrate that i dont hold grudges.

you say i always claim to know everything about everything. well thats just not true. i speak to MDK alot on irc, and there are many times i ask for his help, and there are many times he asks me stuff and i dont have a problem to say i have no idea. so you just dont speak the truth.. you are a habitual liar..
the only reason you perceive me to be like that is that your field of knowledge is lacking to say the least.

Re: the sparda defect

Posted: Thu May 07, 2009 2:09 pm
by avansc
avansc wrote:okay... now lets just hang on here for a seccond.... you didnt start with the name calling?
sparda wrote: The Moderator: (Like Marauder)
The Antagonizer: (Like avansc)
Smarty Pants: (Like M_D_K for sure ;), myself, Avan, Falcy, Mar, and probably a bunch of others here at the forums as well) )
Johnny One-Word: (Like some guy who bitched about Java to me once: i.e. "No you can't")

AntiGayNizer: (Like Trask ) :lol:
you dont call that name calling?, and when i originally said the thing about the dipshit i was referring to the person who wrote the article.
now let me ask you this?? what was your intention and your expected reaction to calling someont an antagonizer... a "Smarty Pants"... a johnny one-word... and something as
insulting as antigaynizer.

you had an intention calling people that. and you did that name calling first. so dont give me your fucking rhetoric.
sparda wrote:But I will suggest one thing for you avan. Your mother owes you an apology for giving birth to you. 8-)
see.. you just say things that are malicious, and thats fine, but dont act like you dont. and what the fuck is that emoticon for... like trying to say. "got you good fucker"?
you are a sad litte fuck.
avansc wrote:"unintelligible " you wanna call me stupid for lack of a better word. well okay. no use in arguing, i challenge you to any intellectual challenge you please. anything. and we can let those results speak for them selves.

ps : if you were referring to not being able to understand me... well then i think we already solved the above challenge.
please read before you make a douche out of yourself. yeah i agree sometimes my sentences are hard to understand, but anyone with an iq of 100 can still discern what i say.

i propose projecteuler.net, i have done the first 50 or so in 2 days. i will wait to you get to 50, then we can see who finishes all of them first?

im not sure how my example of Moose is ridicules, i used it to illustrate that i dont hold grudges.

you say i always claim to know everything about everything. well thats just not true. i speak to MDK alot on irc, and there are many times i ask for his help, and there are many times he asks me stuff and i dont have a problem to say i have no idea. so you just dont speak the truth.. you are a habitual liar..
the only reason you perceive me to be like that is that your field of knowledge is lacking to say the least.
edit: if you really were the pacifist you claim you would have just said something like...
hey, saw this article, very interesting. maybe you can see were you would fall..

Re: the sparda defect

Posted: Thu May 07, 2009 2:23 pm
by MarauderIIC
sparda wrote:sigh . . .

It seems avan dwells and feeds on forum drama. avan, there was a reason why Marauder locked the previous thread, and now you're trying to start it all up AGAIN here? You're definitely right that everyone knows where you stand, you stand on utter diarrhea.
Firstly, I'm not leverage. Do not use my actions as such.

Secondly, if you guys really want to yell at each other, take it somewhere more private. If I see another one of these kinds of threads or posts between you all (M_D_K, sparda, avansc), I'm going to have to remove forum privileges in order to keep you apart until you no longer act this way towards each other in public. I don't care whose fault it was, is, wasn't, or isn't.

I'm not going to lock this. We'll try the honor system.

Re: the sparda defect

Posted: Thu May 07, 2009 2:24 pm
by Falco Girgis
Uhm...

Yeah, what he said!

*pretends to be a good moderator*

Re: the sparda defect

Posted: Thu May 07, 2009 3:14 pm
by dandymcgee
Whew, it's getting hot in here.
GyroVorbis wrote:Uhm...

Yeah, what he said!

*pretends to be a good moderator*
You're the second best mod I've ever met, Gyro. ;)

Re: the sparda defect

Posted: Thu May 07, 2009 3:58 pm
by sparda
Firstly, I'm not leverage. Do not use my actions as such.
I apologize, that was not my intention.

Alright, fine. As far as I'm concerned, I'm done will all this negativity. With that said, then lets get to work. avan, I registered at projecteuler.net, and I'll start working on some problems when I get home.

Re: the sparda defect

Posted: Thu May 07, 2009 4:56 pm
by MadPumpkin
GyroVorbis wrote:*pretends to be a good moderator*
It's ohkay! I think you're a good mod,

*pretends to be a nice person*