Scripting Language development

[Nokurn]

Well, there are plenty of languages that support arbitrary precision integers, some only through libraries (like Java), but many as built-in types.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arbitrary ... #Languages

I have looked, but my code seems to be alot more powerful, since it can store way beyond those integers, it can even store a number which takes up 1GB of hardisk space to store the string value of the number...

The .NET framework's BigInteger class can do that too. That's why such libraries are called "arbitrary"; the only limits to the number's magnitude are the hardware.
Unless your code is being specially developed using a new algorithm for performing arithmetic on arbitrarily large numbers, I would advise that you use an existing library for any code that you plan to use for more than just messing about. These kinds of libraries typically use a number of optimization tricks to make working with large numbers feasible in any small period of time--special algorithms, using the CPU/ALU for 8-, 16-, 32-, 64-, and 128-bit numbers, etc.

[tappatekie]

Well, there are plenty of languages that support arbitrary precision integers, some only through libraries (like Java), but many as built-in types.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arbitrary ... #Languages

I have looked, but my code seems to be alot more powerful, since it can store way beyond those integers, it can even store a number which takes up 1GB of hardisk space to store the string value of the number...

The .NET framework's BigInteger class can do that too. That's why such libraries are called "arbitrary"; the only limits to the number's magnitude are the hardware.
Unless your code is being specially developed using a new algorithm for performing arithmetic on arbitrarily large numbers, I would advise that you use an existing library for any code that you plan to use for more than just messing about. These kinds of libraries typically use a number of optimization tricks to make working with large numbers feasible in any small period of time--special algorithms, using the CPU/ALU for 8-, 16-, 32-, 64-, and 128-bit numbers, etc.

Okay, and I have just multiplied a number with 1 billion zero's!! with 4...
Also, I prefer not to use BigInteger class in .Net because it's only in version 4.5, I prefer to use 2.0 as it's more compatible.

As to new algorithm, all it's doing is just:
12+9
2+9=11 > 9 so 11-10 and carry 1
1+0(nothing there)+the carry = 2
put those together and you get 21

Thats basically, what it does which gives it no limits, except how big of a string you can store in memory,

[tappatekie]

Video has been finished!!! 3.8gb to upload, just need to put a few finishing touches to it. (making the video syncronized with the audio voiceover)

[lalacomun]

Video has been finished!!! 3.8gb to upload, just need to put a few finishing touches to it. (making the video syncronized with the audio voiceover)

Hell yes!!

[tappatekie]

Video is being uploaded, and an announcement, Plywood will now let you import windows libraries e.g kernel32.dll :D

Here is a sample of what you would code in plywood to invoke a dll method

Code: Select all

//No return type use
extern "kernel32.dll" method Beep((int)frequency, (int)duration)

//Having a return type
extern "kernel32.dll" int SendMessage((ptr)handle, (ptr)msg, (ptr)wparam, (ptr)lparam)

//Invoking them
Beep(100, 100)

The process of dynamically invoking win32 methods is as follows (what Im doing anyway...)

• Create a library handle from calling kernel32 LoadLibraryEx
  Get the method pointer from the library by calling kernel32 GetProcAddress
  Then, we need to create a dynamic delegate type for the method so...
  • Make C# code for defining a delegate (with the arguments)
    Compile it
    Get the type of the delegate from the output assembly
  We then create a Delegate object from Marshal.GetDelegateForFunctionPointer
  To invoke now, we just simply do myDelegate.DynamicInvoke(arguments) :D

[tappatekie]

It's HERE!!!

[lalacomun]

cool! ^

[bbguimaraes]

Seems like a good video, but the combination of low quality and small font makes it impossible to see the text. You should fix that for this or at least the next videos.

[tappatekie]

Seems like a good video, but the combination of low quality and small font makes it impossible to see the text. You should fix that for this or at least the next videos.

Text seems just about readable for 720p quality (and full screen) mode on YouTube

[bbguimaraes]

Oh, Youtube has been kind of crazy these days. It just shows 360p quality for me. Nevermind then.

[dandymcgee]

Oh, Youtube has been kind of crazy these days. It just shows 360p quality for me. Nevermind then.

Morons at my college couldn't get the network connection working at any acceptable speed so they decided to "fix" it by rate limiting YouTube. It now takes ~15 minutes of buffer time to load ~1 minute of watchable video. I'm fucking pissed.

[bbguimaraes]

Yeah, that happened at mine too. But they just blocked it for some time, along with several other sites. Now they restored it.

Their blocking is kinda crazy too. Photobucket is blocked, and they claim it's a "social network". Sometimes, when I'm there and checking some programming sites, I can't see the pictures because they are hosted on the site. That's really annoying.

[tappatekie]

Happens to me in college :L Buffering speeds are disgraceful.

I have also updated my first post for now supporting the "Common Language Runtime"!

[THe Floating Brain]

Like the vid

[tappatekie]

Like the vid

Cheers :P