I can solve one too!
I also learned to solve the cube from Dan Brown's youtube-videos, and I scrambled and mixed it so many times that the cube broke.
Now I have a new cube and I've learned a new method called 2 look oll and 2 look pll. Still, I use about one minute at my best.
I find it amusing anyway. *Wished I knew how to lubricate my cube*.
“Should array indices start at 0 or 1? My compromise of 0.5 was rejected without, I thought, proper consideration.â€
(Stan Kelly-Bootle)
Arti-Ravnos wrote:I can solve one too!
I also learned to solve the cube from Dan Brown's youtube-videos, and I scrambled and mixed it so many times that the cube broke.
Now I have a new cube and I've learned a new method called 2 look oll and 2 look pll. Still, I use about one minute at my best.
I find it amusing anyway. *Wished I knew how to lubricate my cube*.
to lube it, see Dan Brown's "how to solve a rubik's cube... faster"
Quit procrastinating and make something awesome.
Ducky wrote:Give a man some wood, he'll be warm for the night. Put him on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
I wonder what algorithm implementation they used. There are lots of different ways to do it and some much more efficient than others. Assuming it's real.
I realized the moment I fell into the fissure that the book would not be destroyed as I had planned.
At first I used dan brown's method, then started using the Fridrich method for the first 2 layers. Still need to learn OLL/PLL (orienting/permuting the last layer)
BTW I can solve the 5x5x5, 4x4x4, 3x3x3, and 2x2x2( ) now. Can't get any larger because they're so expensive.
Quit procrastinating and make something awesome.
Ducky wrote:Give a man some wood, he'll be warm for the night. Put him on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
Here's a new challenge for you all. Try to solve the cube blindfolded. I can't do it myself (yet), but i recommend taking a look at this page and this video if you want to try. It appears to be much easier than it looks. ^^ Good luck to those of you, who is willing to give it a try!
Ginto8 wrote:Still need to learn OLL/PLL (orienting/permuting the last layer)
I reccomend learning 2-look oll and 2-look pll first. Then you only need to learn 9 olls and 6 plls.
Take a look at these videos: 2-look oll and 2-look pll
“Should array indices start at 0 or 1? My compromise of 0.5 was rejected without, I thought, proper consideration.â€
(Stan Kelly-Bootle)